Have you ever wondered why such innovations have been made in some things but in others not? Science is acknowledged as a very important science, while many other not so knowledge required areas are known for. Cooking for instance, is very important to us, but we pay very little attention to it. Why people have given new technological advancements in areas for oil industries, than in gardening? Well obviously because one is more imperative and important than the other. However who makes that choice? Who decides what is more important and what we should place our attention in?
![]() |
| Ladle (n): a deep-bowled long-handled spoon used especially for dipping up and conveying liquids |
Usually what we least value is what we desire the most once we lose it. No one thought on making the housewives work any easier, as it seemed a simple job. No one though in relieving physical work from servants in the eighteenth century, or from burning turnspits. Likewise Wilson says that "the technological stagnation reflects a harsh truth" (Pg 170). The truth is not nice, or colorful. Its harsh and sad. Many people think that having money is enough in the world, and they are terribly incorrect. People should care about the welfare of others, and especially those who are served my many, such as kings and queens. These people however, are those that many times care the less, and the more they have the more blinded they become. To them, it doesn't matter if someone is killed to provide them the most exquisite food. Women skeletons have been found with "signs of acute arthritis, with knees, hips and ankles severely worn by kneeling down and rocking back and forth to crush grain against stone" (Pg. 153). Isn't it absurd the price people have to pay, in order to serve fat selfish wealthy people?
![]() |
| Pestle (n): a usually club-shaped implement for pounding or grinding substances in a mortar |


No comments:
Post a Comment